- Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong has made insinuations about hyperlinks between the Clintons and SBF.
- “The Democratic get together actually benefited from Sam’s cash,” says the influencer.
- Armstrong additionally likens SBF to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, calling him a two-faced toxic operator.
Crypto Analyst BitBoy has made additional claims in regards to the politicians from the Democratic Occasion and Republican Occasion having ties with the convicted former proprietor of the fallen FTX trade and Alameda Analysis. BitBoy goes on to share a number of insights and tidbits from his investigation.
In keeping with Crypto analyst Armstrong, cash was supplied to the Democratic Occasion in exorbitant quantities. He additional added that there have been monetary merchandise paperwork titled “Trump Lose.” Sam’s funds undoubtedly aided the Democratic get together, in response to him.
Armstrong additionally shares that some funds have been supplied to the Republican Occasion, principally, sadly, by means of the whistleblower Ryan Salame. BitBoy revealed that if Bankman-Fried donated cash to Republicans, “the media would have condemned him.”
Sadly in response to BitBoy’s information, not one of the politicians on both facet knew FTX was bancrupt or that Bankman-Fried was a fraud after they took the cash. He additional went on to say:
How might you anticipate politicians who’re clueless about crypto to know the place the cash was coming from? You shouldn’t. They understood the cash was greasing the wheels for Sam to foyer, however that’s regular in politics.
By means of his analysis, Armstrong additional revealed that there simply was not an amazing quantity of people that knew about this rip-off and its intricacies of it. “I do know of 9 folks positively concerned.”
The checklist of the 9 members BitBoy revealed essential in pulling strings for Bankman-Fried have been particularly; Bankman-Fried himself, Caroline, Gary Wang, Constance Wang, Nishad Singh, Sam Trabucco, Dan Friedberg, Barbara Fried, and Joe Bankman. Armstrong talked about different folks akin to Kevin O’Leary being loosely conscious, and others like Amy/John Wu & Mark Wetjen in all probability conscious of the rip-off.
In Armstrong’s opinion, “the purpose is that this was not an excellent advanced and enormous operation. It relied on the belief between the intimate gamers. The reply here’s a clear and resounding no. There was no get together interference. This was a sloppy operation, and SBF was a two-faced toxic operator.”